(Updated with new photos of O’Connells’ Surcingles below)

Back in the early 80s, anyone dressing in the American style, whether a vintage ivy league look or in the then current preppy style would have been familiar with and almost certainly owned at least one surcingle belt.

What exactly is a surcingle belt? Well Wikipedia has only this to say on the subject:’
“A surcingle belt is a belt having a web body with leather fittings on either end and a frame style metal buckle. The web is usually a heavy wool twill and may be solid colored or longitudinally striped, or embroidered with a repeating motif. The leather ends are sewn onto this, and are generally narrowed.
Surcingle belts are conventionally considered an element of casual dress. They are strongly associated with the preppy subculture.”

You can be sure this entry was written by an American because despite being part of the transatlantic influence of British traditional dress on the Ivy League style, virtually no one you speak to in England has ever heard of a surcingle belt. Sure, they’ll know what you’re talking about if you describe it, and may well own one, but without any thought to what it is, the history of it and certainly never calling it by its American name.

In most cases, it will have been acquired as a re-imported element of the globalisation of American style – the ‘chino belt’ or some such misnomer – often a cheap plastic-ended version coming free with the trousers at low end retailers like Marks & Spencers. On the other hand, there will be a whole bunch of owners who know something of this style from its British military origins, where a cotton or wool ‘webbing’ belt might be made of regimental colours as a reminder of past glories. However, in the USA, the surcingle belt once held its own along with the button down shirt and the weejun as ubiquitous objects of the boom years of ivy style.

The first one I owned was (inevitably in early 80s London) from John Simons. Made by the Regent Belt Company, a British maker with a long history. This would have represented one of the company’s mainstays in the export market – coloured belts in cotton or wool with natural (British tan) coloured leather ends and a curved horseshoe shaped buckle, similar to that used for horse tack. That belt was a classic 3 colour horizontal stripe of navy, red and green. It was pretty expensive back then too, something like £24.95 – a big ticket back in 1983. If memory serves it was also my only belt for years, worn day in, day out until it acquired a well worn patina which give it that uncared for look that ivy so behooves.

From the surcingle belt, I graduated to the complex woven leather version popular in the late 80s (it’s worth noting here that along with many of my contemporaries in London, we looked for our style tips to American tourists and businessmen, who in those pre-globalisation days stood out instantly).

For many years after, I adopted a wider heavy leather belt with solid brass buckle, good for jeans and vintage chinos. Then as often happens, somewhere over the years, the surcingle began to disappear as a distinct item. Sure, it was always ever-present in some form or other from Ralph Lauren, (keeper of the flame during the dark years of many an item, madras included), or would turn up from Lands End or even Uniqlo. But these belts were usually a nod to the originals, and over the years almost every maker has moved away from natural tan leather to a deep dark brown. Now, when you search either in store or online, almost every belt has the leather in this colour. The few examples that do go for a natural tan seem to have decided that the original horseshoe brass buckle is not good enough and moved to somehow variants on unnatural squared one.

Back in the day, alongside imported items from such as Regent Belt Co, the US had its own makers of distinction. Trafalgar and Canterbury are both names that will bring back memories to Americans of a certain vintage. Both are still in existence but in the modern offshore brand-only sense. Coach also offered surcingles as of course did Brooks Brothers and J Press. Press still sells them with tan leather ends but in a nod to America’s collective size increase in an unnecessarily stretch fabric.

Here’s a requote from a post by Cardinals5 on AAAC about Canterbury belts:

“In the mid-sixties, the well-dressed traditional customer wore Rivetz ties, Corbin pants, Southwick natural-shoulder jackets, Gant shirts, a Canterbury belt, and Bass Weejuns.”
— Michael Gross, Genuine Authentic: The Real Life of Ralph Lauren

Away from the fashion world, Orvis cornered the market for emblematic versions featuring marlin or ducks or other Trad fetishes. Another retailer of surcingles was O’Connells of Buffalo. However, unlike most of the others, O’Connells actually still sell Made in USA surcingles in all the right colours, including some wonderfully garish tartans and madras. Judging by the images on their site they are exactly as they always have been. I say judging by that, because I’ve just ordered three of them and I’m hoping that O’Connells’ famously never updated website has the photos of the actual items. Because most of the US made surcingles still available, such as those from Dann Online, are made by a New Orleans company called Torino Belt Company who seem to have recently jazzed up their buckles for an altogether less attractive version.

Search on eBay, the one place where you can find pretty much anything you ever wanted these days, and the term ‘surcingle belt’ is woefully under-represented – just three items on US Ebay as a I type! The name seems to have dropped from the lexicon on modern clothing.

Online retailer Eliza B offers some great Leatherman belts in many colours and custom options for a very competitive price. But for some reason the ‘correct’ buckle is only offered with a non-stitched leather tab. Maybe it’s possible to ask for a custom mod. I don’t know, to me it just seems naked without the stitched leather edges, and then wrong with a square buckle. In fact, the Anderson tartan belt on the O’Connells website is the same square buckle version on the Eliza B site, so I hope the ones I ordered do have the right stitching/buckle combo!**

Some of the most decent modern ones are actually by global teen brands RL Rugby and Jack Spade – at least they get the look right, but they’re way overpriced for offshore items.

Belts are also something that has always been disproportionally expensive when compared to other leather items. True, a well made leather belt can be hand cut and stitched, but 95% of leather belts are not that complicated to make and the cost bears little relation to the amount of work involved in even a basic pair of shoes. However, here again the O’Connells versions triumph, because the prices are the same that I paid John Simons back in 1983 – $40 for a the cotton version, $50 for the wool version with madras coming up somewhere in between.

As with their wonderful Shetlands, O’Connells also have a bewildering number of colour options to choose from. It took me a long time to settle down to just three. I thought that three would be enough to last a good decade or so and allow the natural tan leather to break in nicely over the coming years.

After writing this post, I also picked up this Dooney & Bourke vintage version, with a very different but still attractive buckle. Oddly, listed by the seller as a woman’s belt (I suppose 34 waist is uber-slim for many American women these days!) it is of course a men’s 34 and clearly stamped as such. I do love it when seller’s misdescribe things. Having said that it was not cheap, but I like the green and what I presume to be pink stripe. Like fashions in tartans and madras, the webbing on a surcingle often speaks of its vintage.

**(STOP PRESS : The O’Connells belts arrived in LA and my trusted proxy shipper Fred, has confirmed the buckles on these are the classic horseshoes. He also said the quality was amazing for Made in USA items at those prices. This time they’ll be brought over as hand luggage and handed over during a clothing conference at Quo Vadis, boring the wives to death no doubt)

STOP STOP PRESS

Here are some photos of the surcingles from O’Connells. The striped one is stamped ‘O’Connells’ on the inside of the leather tab, and the other two have Leatherman tabs.
Am really pleased with all them and would definitely order more. It’s confirmed that they are the same as the ones available from Eliza B and that they can switch the buckles on the order form, to these traditional shaped ones.

Like most American movies Divorce American Style shows menswear that would have been woefully out of date and unfashionable by 1967.

But we don’t care do we? Any chance to see how Boom Years Ivy was worn in the flesh, rather than rely on dodgy retro recreationists (the like of which have turned modernist style into cartoon Mod style).

In a new occasional series (occasional because of time constraints and the fact that I have no discipline when it comes to blogging), here are some screen shots of Dick Van Dyke in the movie wearing a Baracuta G9, great slim chinos, an awning stripe popover shirt, surcingle belt and Clarks Desert Boots in tan suede.

Oh, and cult Ivyist Jason Robards Jr, one of the great ivy surprises in Hollywood & The Ivy Look, wearing rumpled chinos and Jack Purcell sneakers (he’s supposed to be poor now he’s a divorced American husband).

Not a great movie by any criteria but fun watching for the style of late 60s suburbia.

A few shirt arrivals in the last few days (like I needed any more shirts, but you know how it is!):

A vintage Lion of Troy popover raglan sleeve number, identical in every way to one that guest poster The Woolster found last year. Unfortunately, this one is too big for me even if I attempted to shrink it. Great shirt though, from the boom years of Ivy. Exactly the kind of shirt to be seen on Hollywood actors in the Hollywood and The Ivy Look book. Nearly 50 years languishing in a back room of a men’s store in Washington State!

Next up, a NOS Brooks Brothers classic blue OCBD with unlined collar and cuffs. It’s truly amazing that these are still knocking around from the 1990s at the South Carolina factory. This one has a tiny sewing defect on the cuff that a couple of stitches will remedy, but nothing to detract from these wonderful shirts. The modern US made Brooks still do feel bulletproof, but the collars are hot with a tie, and simply not so casually smart as the unlined version.

Then another oddity – a Southwick for Ships OCBD short sleeve popover made in the US factory for Japan of course. Ships and Beams being a top retailer of modern classics. This shirt features the slightly longer vintage Brooks style placket with four buttons. A lined collar but still a nice shirt and being Japanese proportions its equivalent to a modern BB slim fit. Hard to find any info on these online, aside from the few listings on Rakuten. Definitely Japan only.

Also on its way from Newton St is a nice Brooksgate OCBD in white. I don’t have too many white shirts but sometimes a crisp white with a nice collar roll is called for, and what better than Brooks Brothers’ original slim fit line from the 70s? Measurements are again similar to a modern Slim Fit.